Christ and Horrors
Marilyn McCord Adams wrote this systematic exploration of Christology in response to what she saw as philosophy of religion's inadequate wrestling with the problem of horrendous evils — those sufferings so devastating they seem to render the victim's life not worth living. As both a medieval philosopher and Anglican theologian, Adams recognized that traditional theodicies often fail when confronted with the worst human experiences: childhood abuse, genocide, profound mental illness, and other forms of radical suffering that appear to defeat any possibility of meaning or redemption.
Adams argues that only a robust Christology can address horrors adequately, developing what she calls a "horror-defeating" understanding of Christ's person and work. She contends that the Incarnation itself — God's assumption of human nature in all its vulnerability — transforms the meaning of human suffering by making God a participant rather than merely an observer. Through careful analysis of patristic Christology, particularly Cyril of Alexandria's understanding of the hypostatic union, she demonstrates how Christ's divine-human nature creates the metaphysical possibility for horror-defeat. Her argument moves beyond substitutionary theories of atonement toward a participatory model where Christ's solidarity with victims fundamentally alters their relationship to their suffering, not by explaining it away but by sharing it completely.
The work has proven influential both in philosophical theology and pastoral contexts because it refuses to minimize genuine evil while maintaining Christian hope. Adams provides conceptual tools for thinking about redemption that do not require victims to find silver linings in their trauma or accept facile explanations for their pain. Instead, she offers a vision of salvation that takes horrors seriously while insisting on their ultimate defeat through divine participation in human experience.
This book serves readers grappling with profound suffering — whether personally, pastorally, or intellectually — who find traditional apologetics insufficient. It particularly benefits those with philosophical training who want rigorous theological reflection on evil and redemption. Readers seeking simple answers or comfortable theodicies should look elsewhere; Adams demands sustained engagement with both conceptual complexity and existential darkness.