Answer to Sir Thomas More's Dialogue
William Tyndale's "An Answer to Sir Thomas More's Dialogue" stands as one of the most significant theological polemics of the English Reformation. Written in 1531, this treatise responds directly to Thomas More's "Dialogue Concerning Heresies" (1529), which had attacked both Tyndale's English New Testament translation and Protestant theology more broadly. More, serving as Henry VIII's Lord Chancellor, had positioned himself as Catholicism's chief intellectual defender against the spread of Lutheran ideas in England. Tyndale, writing from exile in Antwerp, crafted this response to defend both the principle of vernacular Scripture and core Protestant doctrines.
Tyndale's argument moves systematically through More's accusations, defending translation choices that More had characterized as deliberate distortions. Where More insisted that translating "ecclesia" as "congregation" rather than "church" undermined ecclesiastical authority, Tyndale argues for linguistic accuracy and the New Testament's vision of Christian community. He counters More's defense of clerical celibacy, transubstantiation, and purgatory with appeals to Scripture's sufficiency and clarity. Throughout, Tyndale maintains that the church's traditions must submit to biblical authority rather than Scripture submitting to institutional interpretation. His prose combines scholarly precision with passionate conviction, revealing both his humanist training and his commitment to making theological truth accessible to ordinary believers.
This work crystallized the intellectual foundations of English Protestantism during its formative period, influencing subsequent generations of reformers and theologians. Tyndale's defense of vernacular translation principles shaped English biblical scholarship, while his articulation of Scripture's authority over tradition became foundational to Protestant hermeneutics. The treatise demonstrates how Reformation theology developed through direct engagement with Catholic apologetics rather than in isolation.
Who should read this: Students of Reformation history seeking to understand the theological debates that shaped English Protestantism, and those interested in early arguments for biblical translation and scriptural authority. This is not light devotional reading but requires familiarity with sixteenth-century theological controversies and some tolerance for polemical discourse.