Gloss on the Song of Songs

  • Year 1218
  • Type Commentary
  • Genre Biblical commentary
  • Tradition Medieval Catholic
  • Original language Latin

A running gloss on the Song of Songs, composed in 1218 while Thomas Gallus was a canon regular of the abbey of Saint-Victor in Paris, before his move to Italy and his long abbacy at Sant'Andrea in Vercelli. It is the first of three commentaries he would write on the same book across some twenty-five years, and the briefest. Gallus came to the Song with an unusual set of tools. He was the Latin West's most committed reader of Pseudo-Dionysius, producing paraphrases and expositions of the entire Dionysian corpus, and he inherited from Hugh and Richard of Saint-Victor a tradition that treated Scripture as a training ground for contemplation rather than a quarry for propositions. The Glossa is what happens when the Song, read as a mystical text since Origen and preached on at length by Bernard, is placed inside a Dionysian architecture of ascent.

Gallus reads the exchanges between bride and Bridegroom as a graded itinerary. The soul does not simply love God; it rises through ordered stages, which Gallus aligns with the nine angelic orders of the Dionysian hierarchies, each grade naming a distinct capacity of receiving and returning divine light. The decisive move comes at the summit. Where the tradition often let intellect and love ascend together, Gallus separates them and subordinates the first to the second: understanding reaches a limit and fails, and what passes beyond into union is the affection alone, the apex of the mind, the principal affection that touches God where knowing cannot follow. Love here is not a supplement to knowledge but a mode of cognition in its own right, a knowing by experience and contact. The bride's request for a kiss, her searching in the night, her wounding — these become the technical vocabulary of a theology of unknowing in which darkness is not deprivation but the sign that the soul has arrived.

The Glossa matters chiefly because this fusion of Dionysian negation with affective bridal mysticism became one of the main channels by which apophatic theology entered later Western contemplative writing. Bonaventure drew on Gallus; so did Gerson; and the English author of The Cloud of Unknowing worked from Gallus's Dionysian paraphrase, carrying the primacy of love over intellect into vernacular prose.

Who should read this: readers of The Cloud of Unknowing who want to see where its central claim came from, and anyone tracing how Dionysius was received and transformed in the twelfth and thirteenth centuries. Not a devotional commentary and not an introduction to the Song of Songs; its compression assumes the Latin exegetical tradition it abbreviates, and readers wanting historical-critical treatment of the biblical text should look elsewhere entirely.

Edition details and descriptions on this page were compiled with the aid of AI research tools. Readers are encouraged to verify specifics (publisher, translator, edition year) against the originating source before purchase or citation.