Jerome's Commentary on Daniel emerged from the tumultuous final years of the Western Roman Empire, completed in 407 amid the barbarian invasions that would soon culminate in Alaric's sack of Rome. Writing from his monastery in Bethlehem, the great biblical scholar undertook this work partly in response to the anti-Christian polemics of the philosopher Porphyry, who had argued that the Book of Daniel was a second-century forgery rather than genuine sixth-century prophecy. Jerome's commentary thus carries both exegetical and apologetic weight, defending the authenticity and prophetic character of Daniel while providing detailed verse-by-verse interpretation.
The commentary demonstrates Jerome's characteristic blend of rigorous philological analysis and theological insight. He draws extensively on earlier Christian interpreters, particularly Hippolytus and Origen, while also engaging seriously with Jewish exegetical traditions he encountered through his Hebrew studies. Jerome's treatment of Daniel's apocalyptic visions proved especially influential, particularly his identification of the four kingdoms in Daniel 2 and 7 with Babylon, Media-Persia, Greece, and Rome. His interpretation of the "little horn" as Antiochus Epiphanes, combined with his understanding of Daniel's prophecies as extending to the end times, established a framework for Christian apocalyptic interpretation that would endure for centuries. The work also showcases Jerome's linguistic skills, as he frequently compares the Latin Vulgate with Hebrew and Greek texts to resolve interpretive difficulties.
Jerome's Daniel commentary became a foundational text for medieval Christian understanding of prophecy and history, shaping how subsequent generations read both Daniel and the broader apocalyptic tradition. His historical-grammatical approach, unusual for its time, anticipated later developments in biblical scholarship. This work will particularly benefit readers interested in patristic biblical interpretation, the development of Christian apocalyptic thought, or Jerome's contribution to biblical scholarship. Those seeking devotional or purely theological treatments of Daniel may find Jerome's philological focus and polemical concerns less immediately accessible.
Commentary on Daniel
by Jerome
Jerome's Commentary on Daniel emerged from the tumultuous final years of the Western Roman Empire, completed in 407 amid the barbarian invasions that would soon culminate in Alaric's sack of Rome. Writing from his monastery in Bethlehem, the great biblical scholar undertook this work partly in response to the anti-Christian polemics of the philosopher Porphyry, who had argued that the Book of Daniel was a second-century forgery rather than genuine sixth-century prophecy. Jerome's commentary thus carries both exegetical and apologetic weight, defending the authenticity and prophetic character of Daniel while providing detailed verse-by-verse interpretation.
The commentary demonstrates Jerome's characteristic blend of rigorous philological analysis and theological insight. He draws extensively on earlier Christian interpreters, particularly Hippolytus and Origen, while also engaging seriously with Jewish exegetical traditions he encountered through his Hebrew studies. Jerome's treatment of Daniel's apocalyptic visions proved especially influential, particularly his identification of the four kingdoms in Daniel 2 and 7 with Babylon, Media-Persia, Greece, and Rome. His interpretation of the "little horn" as Antiochus Epiphanes, combined with his understanding of Daniel's prophecies as extending to the end times, established a framework for Christian apocalyptic interpretation that would endure for centuries. The work also showcases Jerome's linguistic skills, as he frequently compares the Latin Vulgate with Hebrew and Greek texts to resolve interpretive difficulties.
Jerome's Daniel commentary became a foundational text for medieval Christian understanding of prophecy and history, shaping how subsequent generations read both Daniel and the broader apocalyptic tradition. His historical-grammatical approach, unusual for its time, anticipated later developments in biblical scholarship. This work will particularly benefit readers interested in patristic biblical interpretation, the development of Christian apocalyptic thought, or Jerome's contribution to biblical scholarship. Those seeking devotional or purely theological treatments of Daniel may find Jerome's philological focus and polemical concerns less immediately accessible.
Editions
External off-site sources
Free downloads